breast Category

Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

April 29th, 2008 by admin in skin-sparing, mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction, breast reconstruction, skin-sparing mastectomy, satisfaction, breast, Reconstruction, Oncological safety, patient satisfaction, safety

 

The London Breast Institute, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK; Department of Surgery, University College London, London, UK.

INTRODUCTION: The management of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is not based on evidence from randomised controlled trials. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncological safety, post-operative morbidity and patients’ satisfaction with SSM and IBR using the latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap and/or breast prosthesis. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive women underwent 93 SSMs with IBR (10 bilateral), using the LD flap plus implant (n=55) or implant alone (n=38), indications included early breast cancer and prophylaxis due to BRCA-1 gene mutation. Nipple reconstruction was performed in 38 patients, using the trefoil local flap technique, nipple sharing or Monocryl mesh. Twenty-three underwent contra-lateral surgery in order to optimise symmetry, including 15 augmentations and eight mastopexy/reduction mammoplasties. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery was assessed on a linear visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied). RESULTS: There was no local recurrence (LR) after a median follow-up of 34 months (range=3-79 months). Overall survival was 98.8%, three patients developed distant disease and one patient died of metastatic breast cancer. No case of partial or total LD flap loss was observed. Morbidities included infection, requiring implant removal in two patients and one patient developed marginal ischaemia of the skin envelope. Significant capsule formation, requiring capsulotomy, was observed in 87% of patients who had either PMR or prior RT compared with 13% for those who did not have RT. Sixty-one (73.5%) of 83 patients completed the questionnaire with a median and mean satisfaction scores of 10.0 and 9.3, respectively (range=6-10). CONCLUSION: SSM with IBR is associated with low morbidity, high levels of patient satisfaction and is oncologically adequate for T(is), T1 and T2 tumours without extensive skin involvement.


Aspiration cytology of extramammary tumours metastatic to the breast.

April 23rd, 2008 by admin in tumours metastatic, extramammary tumours, Aspiration cytology, breast

 

Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32-A, Chandigarh. umahanda@hotmail.com

This study was undertaken to highlight the use of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to distinguish tumours metastatic to the breast from primary breast malignancies. A total of 1866 fine needle aspirates of the breast were performed during a period of 7 years. Three hundred and fourteen cases of breast malignancies were diagnosed and 5 (1.5%) out of these cases were metastatic in origin. The metastatic tumors included, 2 cases of malignant melanoma (chest wall and left arm), 1 case each of haematolymphoid malignancy, adenocarcinoma of the ovary, and squamous cell carcinoma (left leg). FNA diagnosis of metastasis to the breast is essential in order to avoid unnecessary mastectomy and to ensure appropriate chemotherapy and/or irradiation treatment.


Early phase II trial of oral vorinostat in relapsed or refractory breast, colorectal, or non-small cell lung cancer.

April 22nd, 2008 by admin in breast, colorectal, small cell lung cancer, cell lung cancer, relapsed, oral vorinostat, Phase II, refractory, Early phase II, phase II trial, lung cancer

 

Respiratory Oncology Unit (Pulmonology), University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium, johan.vansteenkiste@uz.kuleuven.ac.be.

Vorinostat (Zolinza(R)) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has demonstrated activity in patients with advanced solid tumors in phase I trials. A multicenter, open-label phase II trial of oral vorinostat 200, 300 or 400 mg bid for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was conducted. Patients with measurable, relapsed or refractory breast or non-small cell lung cancer who had received >/=1 prior therapy or colorectal cancer who had received >/=2 prior therapies were eligible. The response rate, safety and tolerability were evaluated. Sixteen patients (median age, 62 years; median 5.5 prior therapies) were enrolled. Six patients received 400 mg bid, six received 300 mg bid and four received 200 mg bid (14 days/3 weeks). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at the 400 or 300 mg bid levels were anorexia, asthenia, nausea, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, and weight loss. No DLTs were observed at the 200 mg bid level. Disease stabilization was observed in eight patients, but there were no confirmed responses. The median TTP was 33.5 days. Eleven patients discontinued due to clinical adverse experiences (AEs). The most common drug-related AEs were anorexia (81%), fatigue (62%), nausea (62%), diarrhea (56%), vomiting (56%), thrombocytopenia (50%) and weight loss (50%). Drug-related AEs >/= grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (50%), anemia (12%), asthenia (12%) and nausea (12%). Vorinostat in a daily oral schedule for 14 days/3 weeks was tolerable at 200 mg bid only, and no responses were observed in this study. Most patients, however, had limited drug exposure which did not allow a reliable efficacy analysis.