Cervical Cancer Category

Over-expression of FOXM1 transcription factor is associated with cervical cancer progression and pathogenesis.

May 12th, 2008 by admin in cervical cancer progression, pathogenesis, transcription, FOXM1 transcription, Transcription factor, Over-expression, Cervical Cancer

 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China.

The Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) transcription factor plays a crucial role in regulating expression of cell cycle genes which are essentially involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and transformation. Recent studies have reported that aberrant expression of FOXM1 in a variety of human cancers is associated with their aggressive behaviour. However, the functional significance of FOXM1 in human cervical cancer is not known. We have shown that FOXM1 was significantly over-expressed in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) compared to normal cervical epithelium immunohistochemically (p < 0.001). In addition, intratumoural FOXM1 positivity was increased in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and carcinoma, compared with that in normal epithelium, indicating that FOXM1 is involved in tumour progression. Indeed, this is supported by clinicopathological analysis that the over-expression of FOXM1 was significantly associated with tumour late stage (p = 0.012) and cell proliferation marker, Ki67 (p < 0.001). Functionally, enforced expression of FOXM1c in FOXM1-deficient cervical cancer cells (C33A) remarkably enhanced cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth ability. Conversely, depletion of FOXM1 by RNA interference in FOXM1-over-expressing cervical cancer cells (SiHa) caused significant inhibition on cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth ability on soft agar. This inhibitory phenomenon was associated with the reduced expressions of cyclin B1, cyclinD1 and cdc25B but increased expression of p27(Kip1) and p21(Cip1). Our findings suggest a role for FOXM1 in the development and pathogenesis of human cervical SCC. Copyright (c) 2008 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Lymph Edema of the Lower Extremities after Lymphadenectomy and Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer.

April 23rd, 2008 by admin in Cervical Cancer, Lymphadenectomy, Lower Extremities, Lymph Edema, radiotherapy

 

Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Germany, Juergen.Fueller@med.uni-jena.de.

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of clinical lymph edema after lymphadenectomy and postoperative radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1994-2002 192 patients with risk factors for recurrence received radiotherapy with FIGO I (58.8%), II (35.4%), III (4.2%) or IV (1.6%). RT consisted of teletherapy (10.4%), brachytherapy of the vaginal vault (20.8%) or a combination of both (68.8%). Additional chemotherapy was given in 69 patients (35.9%). Surgery comprised laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) (35.4%), radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) (48.4%), simple hysterectomy (HE) (11.5%) or exenteration (4.7%). RESULTS: 73 patients had lymph node metastases, 119 had negative lymph nodes. In patients with LARVH 6-74 (median 30) lymph nodes were removed, with RAH 3-70 (median 21 lymph nodes), and after HE or exenteration 5-50 (median 13 lymph nodes). 90 patients had 25 or less lymph nodes removed, 83 patients more than 25 lymph nodes removed. Prognostic factors, such as age, FIGO stages, histologic grading and type of histology were well balanced in these cohorts. 45 (23.4%) of all patients developed clinically relevant lymph edema of the lower limb with a median latency of 11 (1-121) months. When 25 or less lymph nodes were removed 17.8% of patients developed leg edema, when more than 25 lymph nodes were removed 32.5% of patients were diagnosed with lymph edema (p = 0.025). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy had no influence on the incidence of leg edema. Overall survival at 5 (10) years was independent of number of lymph nodes removed. CONCLUSION: The data suggest increasing rates of leg edema with increasing number of lymph nodes dissected independent of the type of radiotherapy and chemotherapy performed. The lymph node sampling policy should be planned carefully in respect to minimize the risk of leg lymph edema.